Shall we not get our dander-up and quibble over our obvious pre-predisposed political attitudes and thereby agree that this scheduled 'hearing' before a United States senate committee this Thursday has zero credibility? There is suspicious behavior coming from both Democrats and Republicans as a woman brings forth accusation of a thirty-year old sexual asault alegedly committed by an individual nominated for and awaiting confirmation to the United States Supreme Court.
The Republican Party is in a power position to easily confirm a conservative judge who will likely be the 'swing-vote' to finally overturn their long time cry for overturning Roe v. Wade and put the skids to legal abortion. The Trump supporters also like the philosophy of this judge because he can argue that a President should be left alone while in office and not subject to investigation into any possible wrong-doings. If you cannot grasp that appeal to Trump, well you've evidently been in a coma.
The Democrats not only wish to 'stall' this confirmation as they hope for a swing of political clout coming their way after the November 2018, mid-term elections but they are still in a get-even angry mood over the GOP's sandbagging Obama's Supreme Court nomination back in March 2016.
You ask, "'Mel, what's your point? Where's the dog & pony show?" Okay, take those blinders off, NOW. If there is any kind of injustice claimed by you or your neighbor is it not reasonable to interview anybody and everybody who MAY have witnessed or have pertinent information about the alleged action of injustice as the attempt is made to resolve the Question?? If there is no appetite for this approach, then we should not have an elaborate display or presentation, which insults the intelligence of those who have a degree of intelligence. We have professional wrestling for such.
No comments:
Post a Comment